Raging at moral hypocrisy

This morning on BBC Radio Five Live the American band, “Rage Against the Machine” landed the BBC in trouble by repeating four times “Fuck you , I won’t do what you tell me” in their rendition of their song “killing in the name of”.  There are a number of issues which make this event note worthy.  In no particular order:

  • Rage Against the Machine is widely tipped to become Christmas number one this year after a grass roots campaign to keep X-Factor off the top spot.
  • Nicky Campbell was conducting the interview (which added to serious comedy value)
  • The production team had asked the band not to swear, were surprised when they did and then deemed it so problematic that they did swear that they decided to cut them off before the end of the song

I will briefly take up this last point. 

Firstly, did they seriously expect a band (even if you knew nothing about the bands history could you not guess from the name) to not go against the orders and swear on live radio? Anyone (even Nicky) must have seen that one coming.  Apparently not, check out the surprise and panic in the reaction (http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/dec/17/rage-agains-machine-singer-swears). 

Secondly, why are we so upset to hear swear words on radio? All you have to do is jump into a London cab or watch some football on the stands to hear some good old fashioned swearing! In fact, you have to do well to avoid swearing these days.  Fuck it…I would go as far as to say it’s almost impossible to go a day in an urban environment without hearing some “offensive” language.  Why do we insist on representing an alternative reality in our media and suppressing the charms of everyday life?

Let’s clarify something, I believe strongly in mediating what slips onto our TV’s and radio’s.  There is some stuff out there which is plain nasty.  What I am suggesting however, is that we have got our morals confused with tradition.  Why do we allow so much grotesque violence (for no reason other than historically violence was considered ok) and yet blackout swearing and sex? We can see this moral puzzle played out in film ratings.  Hotel Rwanda for example, follows the story of the Rwandan Genocide (in some harrowing detail) and is considered OK for a 12 year old to watch (in the UK).  If you added in some boobs and casual bit of swearing this would suddenly become unacceptable for a 12/13/14 year old to watch.  Have you ever questioned why an erect penis is an absolute taboo in film, but there seems to be no limit to the levels of violence that can be portrayed in films? Now question which one is most “normal”? If I had a choice I would let my kids see and hear swearing and sex way before the levels of violence that are normalised in our society.  I suggest the only difference is which morals have been historically acceptable?

The only shame about this whole story is that Rage and the advertising chiefs up at Sony BMG (who own epic records) know that swearing on radio will be a media money spinner!

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under Music

3 responses to “Raging at moral hypocrisy

  1. Pingback: George Osborne – the contentious cunt | Hynd's Blog

  2. This is something I’ve been saying for a while. For another example, take my mother, who is happy to watch the Bourne films (and all the violence inherent in them) as opposed to, say, Die Hard, purely because they don’t feature as much swearing.

    As for Radio 5 Live… why have them on, if you’re not going to let the band perform their song? Miley bastard Cirus would be allowed to perform in full, and her “songs” offend me.

    Like

    • Your comment about your mum is interesting in that it highlights the transition many people of an older generation are having to go through between what was acceptable when they grew up and norms today. Some beliefs are easier to let go of than others but I find with most older people you can find one or two norms that they cannot let go of (in your mothers case swearing being wrong). I have a friend’s dad who refuses to wear a black shirt because of its connections with Mosley. My own father is a gentleman to the last and will always hold doors open for ladies etc. There is nothing wrong with any of this by itself until they interact with someone who finds these societal norms offensive (e.g. a radical feminist with my father). Ultimately it boils down to your ability to recognise that your own morality is exactly that…your own morality.

      The grey area is about what people should or should not be exposed to…e.g. – should people who listen to Nicky Campbell’s morning show be “subjected” to hearing swearing? On this one I suggest yes purely because if you listen to Nicky Campbell’s morning show you deserve anything that is thrown at you.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s