People take to the Streets across the world to show thier commitment to equal rights
Homophobia is still rife across the EU. Not just through individual attitudes, but through governmental action. A court in Lithuania initially banned this years gay pride event in Vilnius before this decision was overturned. The event however, was limited to about 500 participants as over 1000 would be marchers were forcibly held away by riot police who fired tear gas at them. Police with dogs and horseback ringed the entire event.
Surveys show that about 66% of Lithuania’s population still oppose the gay pride event. The country has struggled with continued criticism since joining the EU in 2004 for its intolerance toward homosexuality. This comment is taken from an Associated Press article about this years event:
A Catholic Mass at the nearby national cathedral was held to pray for homosexuals. “Sweden has already wiped out traditional families. Now they came over here to tell us how to live, how to think and who to sleep with. Lithuania will not allow such perversions,” said Jonas Kempinskas, who walked from the Cathedral to the protest holding a huge cross.
The Swedish Minister for European Affairs Birgitta Ohlsson attended the march. She was the highest profile foreign attendee but 5 members of the European Parliament also attended it. A handful of British diplomats made an appearance. At the time of writing at least 12 people have been arrested. I do not hold out much hope for them being treated well in custody.
Vygaudas Ušackas, the new EU's next special representative for Afghanistan. Photo thanks to the Baltic development forum
Last month Dalia Grybauskaitė, Lithuania’s president, deemed there to be enough evidence to sack Vygaudas Ušackas, for alledgedly helping to cover up CIA secret detetion sites. Ušackas has just been appointed as the European Union’s next special representative for Afghanistan and head of its delegation in Kabul. With the growing influence of EU delegations with the implementation of Lisbon, this appointment is a serious issue. Why has the EU deemed this man fit to represent us, when one of its Member States has deemed him unfit for national government?
The BBC reported that “The CIA set up at least two secret detention centres in Lithuania after the 11 September 2001 terror attacks on the US”. It is unknown how many other “black spots” there were/are on European soil. We do however; know that they were integral to the coalition’s widely illegal “war on terror”. The centres were used as stop off points for the US’s practice of “extraordinary rendition” (this broadly means capturing someone in one country and then moving them to another country with no legal oversight – it also just happens to be that the country that they get moved to is often notorious for its use of torture). A European Parliament report described “hundreds” such flights taking place.
The report by a parliamentary committee which highlighted Lithuania’s role in this sordid business also absolved the political elite of any responsibility stating “the president was unaware of exactly what the US intelligence service was doing”. Yet despite this, he felt it necessary to fire Ušackas. Ušackas had served as Lithuania’s ambassador to the EU, the United States and the United Kingdom before he became foreign minister in 2008. This would not have been a decision taken lightly by the President.
This remains a baffling mystery to me. Why, considering all that has been said, would the EU (you know the beacon of human rights), choose Ušackas to head the delegation in Kabul? Did Cathy Ashton (who he is accountable to) have a say in this – one assumes so! The EU needs to show the world that it holds its values in the highest priority. It cannot do this, by putting people who are (accused of being) complicit in wide spread torture in charge of a delegation – especially such an important one as Afghanistan!