Tag Archives: Tuition Fees

Tuition Fees – The elephant in the room

students have strange understandings of money

I wrote before about how Aaron Porter refused to answer whether the new system of tuition fees is more or less fair than the old system.  I wrote that blog then because I was getting frustrated with people missing the subtleties of the issue.  It appears now however, there is a rather large elephant in the room that all sides of the debate are ignoring.

The perception of money is far more important than the reality of what people have to spend. Regardless of how much money someone will end up paying to go to university, it is student’s perception of money that will in the end determine whether or not they will apply. Simply put, I opposed the rise in tuition fee’s most vehemently because of the headline figure of £9,000 (to put it into context it is exactly the same as annual salary). This sort of money makes those from middle to lower-income families’ shudder. Most students will not be thinking about potential future income levels etc…But will be reading front page newspaper headlines.  Those in power have to think about the consequences of this.

In reality, if you leave university and you earn less than £21,000 you pay nothing for your degree (I had to pay for my degree in full). This is about 50% of Britain’s current workforce.  Every pupil will pay LESS per month than they currently do under the new system.  Yet, this is not what A-levels students are thinking about.  We now have to make a concerted effort to make sure every potential student is in an educated position to make a fully informed decision about whether or not to go to university.  Yes, it might be expensive (very expensive) but only if you are earning a decent salary when you come out the other end.  University graduates will continue to be at the centre of our economic future and we cannot afford to let talented individuals mis-out on these opportunities.

Meanwhile, we who believe in a state funded education system should continue to make those arguments vehemently within our own circles.  For during this whole debate about a rise in tuition fees it should not be lost that education is a right nor a privilege.


Filed under Politics

The question Aaron Porter refuses to answer


Aaron Porter

Aaron Porter, the NUS President has consistently failed to answer one question.  This one question remains the elephant in the room for the NUS, and will continue to leave them open to accusations of politicising tuition fees until it is answered. The question…”Is the proposed package of student tuition fees fairer than the current system?”


I suspect, the reason that Aaron will not (or cannot) answer this question is because the answer is simply yes.  The system being proposed is fairer than what we currently have.  How can this be I hear you cry, when the newspapers are filled with accusations of £9,000 a year tuition fees.  Lets run through some of the positives in the package that Aaron seems so unwilling to talk about (when despite them having such a massive impact on student’s lives).

1) No part-time student will pay up front to go to university. For the first time in decades, up-front charges for part-time students will be scrapped.  Part-time students currently make up about 40% of the student population and are essentially discriminated against.  This will end under the new package.

2) The repayment on Student loans will be shifted away from the current system towards a weighted system that takes into account you’re to pay.  At the moment, everyone earning £15,000 starts paying back the same, regardless of their income.  The new proposal will lift the figure where you start to pay back your loan from £15,000 to £21,000.  This means, if you earn less than 21,000 and stay there you pay back nothing! It also means that if you lose your job or take a sabbatical, your repayments are frozen.  Equally, if after 30 years you still have out standing debt, it gets written off.  This means that if you do not benefit financially from university, you do not lose out financially.

Graduates who DO earn over 21,000 will start to repay their loans at a rate of 9% of their earnings above 21,000.  This means, that repayment, per month will be lower for all students than the current scheme.  As your income increases, so the interest rate on the loan increases (in a similar fashion to staggered income tax levels).  In balance, this means the lowest earning 25% of graduates will pay back LESS than they currently do, and the top 30% of earners will pay back more than they borrow.

3) Support for living costs will increase for families earning up to 45,000.  Extra money is being put into grants for living costs and an extra loan will be made available to these students.  It is an improvement again on the current system.

4) The headline £9,000 a year will be in a minority of cases.  If a university wants to charge more than £6,000 they will have to meet targets to ensure they attract a more diverse range of students, specifically students from poorer backgrounds.  In the UK, our university education system still excludes the poor.  This is something that we should be ashamed about.  Less than a fifth of the poorest quarter of our society make it to university.  This package will create a National Scholarship Programme for students on low incomes – offering the first years tuition free.  There will be a greater emphasis put on the university to work with poorer schools to appeal to their students.

Do I think this system that is being proposed is fair? No! Do I think it is fairer than the current system? Yes! Why can’t Aaron Porter say this? Sadly, I suspect that Aaron Porter’s membership to the Labour Party might well be clouding his judgement on this issue. He seems incapable of criticising New Labour (who had an election pledge to scrap tuition fees and then went back on it despite having a massive majority).

His union has started a campaign to target some of the most progressive MP’s in Parliament. An example is Sarah Teather (The one who established the all party group on Guantanamo Bay, was found to be spotlessly clean in the expenses scandal and was one of the fiercest opponents to the war in Iraq).  How can Aaron Porter honestly believe “decapitating” (his word not mine) an MP like Sarah is a good thing for students? It again, makes a mockery of student politics presenting students as incapable of thinking about anything other than this one issue.  It undermines students and does NOT represent them.

It is, in my opinion, time Aaron Porter started playing grown up politics and working with the Lib-Dems who are a junior partner in a coalition government and are committed to working for a fairer system.  The Lib-Dems in government have made it fairer but we are still left in a hugely unfair system.  It is about time the NUS slipped a little subtlety into their arguments.



Filed under Economics, Politics